How can we increase the involvement of primary health care in the treatment of tobacco dependence? A meta‐analysis
- 18 February 2004
- Vol. 99 (3) , 299-312
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00672.x
Abstract
Aims A systematic review of studies testing the effectiveness of educational and practice base strategies to increase the involvement of primary health‐care practitioners in the treatment of tobacco dependence.Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library (1966–2001). Selection criteria included studies that used randomized or controlled clinical designs, controlled before and after trials and interrupted time‐series designs and that presented objective and interpretable measures of practitioners’ behaviour and biochemically verified patient quit rates.Review methods A meta‐analysis, using a random effects model, of 24 programmes identified in 19 trials. Effect sizes were adjusted by inverse variance weights to control for studies’ sample sizes.Findings Analyses to explain the heterogeneity of effect sizes found that interventions were equally effective in changing practitioners’ screening and advice‐giving rates and their patients’ quit rates. Absolute increases for the intervention above the comparison groups were 15% (95% CI = 7–22) for screening rates, 13% (95% CI = 9–18) for advice‐giving rates and 4.7% (95% CI = 2.5–6.9) for biochemically verified patient quit rates. Practitioners in training programmes were effective in changing their patients’ quit rates but not their own screening rates; educational interventions were more effective than practice‐based interventions. For established practitioners, programmes were effective in changing their screening and advice‐giving rates, but not their patients’ quit rates; a combination of practice‐based and educational interventions were more effective.Conclusions Primary health‐care practitioners can be engaged in the treatment of tobacco dependence to increase equally their screening and advice‐giving rates and their patients’ quit rates with outcomes of considerable public health and clinical significance. The provision of educational interventions for practitioners in training in combination with systematic outreach practice‐based support for established practitioners is likely to be an effective strategy to increase smoking quit rates throughout primary health care.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Smoking cessation activities by general practitioners and practice nursesTobacco Control, 2001
- Smoking cessation guidelines for health professionals: an updateThorax, 2000
- Meta‐analyses in alcohol and other drug abuse treatment researchAddiction, 2000
- Randomized Controlled Trial of a Computer Strategy to Increase General Practitioner Preventive CarePreventive Medicine, 1999
- Tools to Improve Documentation of Smoking Status: Continuous Quality Improvement and Electronic Medical RecordsArchives of Family Medicine, 1999
- Stages of Change training for opportunistic smoking intervention by the primary health care team. Part I : randomised controlled trial of the effect of training on patient smoking outcomes and health professional behaviour as recalled by patientsHealth Education Journal, 1998
- Tobacco Control activites of primary-care physicians in the Community Intervention Trial for Smoking CessationTobacco Control, 1997
- Computerized Protocol for Preventive Medicine: A Controlled Self-Audit in Family PracticeFamily Practice, 1989
- Using nurses for preventive activities with computer assisted follow up: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ, 1989
- Recording Patients' Consumption of Social Drugs in a Family Medicine Residency: a Longitudinal StudyFamily Practice, 1985