Functional assessment of coloanal anastomosis with reservoir and excision of the anal transition zone
- 1 November 1991
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 34 (11) , 967-972
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02049959
Abstract
Conservation of the anal transition zone (ATZ) has been deemed necessary for continence after coloanal anastomosis (CAA) with reservoir. Therefore, we have studied functional and manometric results after CAA with reservoir and excision of the ATZ in 18 consecutive patients (mean age, 65.2 years; ten males and eight females), 17.4 months after closure of a temporary loop colostomy (Study 1). Twelve of the 18 initial patients were studied again 30.2 months after closure (Study 2). In Study 1, all patients underwent 1) a standardized interview, 2) a manometric study with measurement of anal pressure at rest (PR), voluntary contraction (VC), inhibitor anal reflex (IAR), conscious sensation (CS), and maximum tolerable volume (MTV), and 3) a liquid continence test (LCT) with measurement of colonic reservoir pressure during infusion. In Study 2, patients underwent all the same tests except the LCT. Results were compared with those of six controls (mean age, 65.8 years; two females and four males). In Study 1, 14/18 patients were continent; PR, VC, and CS did not differ among continent patients, incontinent patients, and controls. MTV was significantly lower in incontinent patients (mean ± SD, 165±46.5 ml) than in continent patients and controls (mean±SD, 261±50.8 ml vs. 250.7±83 ml). IAR was not observed in continent or incontinent patients but was observed in controls. Contraction waves in the colonic reservoir during LCT were more frequent in incontinent patients (4/4) than in continent patients (4/14), and their amplitudes were higher (119 vs. 32 mm Hg). In Study 2, 12/12 patients were continent; PR and MTV remained unchanged except in the two initially incontinent patients, in whom MTV was increased. VC was slightly increased (94.7 vs. 116 mm Hg). IAR remained absent in all patients. We conclude that 1) excision of the ATZ did not increase the risk of incontinence, and 2) poor functional results were mainly due to small MTV and contraction waves in the colonic reservoir.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excisionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Discrimination is not impaired by excision of the anal transition zone after restorative proctocolectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Anorectal Function after Low Anterior Resection for CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1986
- Resection and colo-anal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and colo-anal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectumBritish Journal of Surgery, 1986
- The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1984
- Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectumDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1982
- Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resectionBritish Journal of Surgery, 1980
- Mechanisms of Idiopathic Constipation: Outlet ObstructionGastroenterology, 1978
- The relation of sensation in the anal canal to the functional anal sphincter: a possible factor in anal continenceGut, 1963