Offering to Return Results to Research Participants: Attitudes and Needs of Principal Investigators in the Children's Oncology Group
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology
- Vol. 25 (9) , 704-708
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00043426-200309000-00006
Abstract
The offer to return a summary of results to participants after the conclusion of clinical research has many potential benefits. The authors determined current practice and attitudes and needs of researchers in establishing programs to return results to research participants. An Internet survey of all 236 principal investigators (PIs) of the Children's Oncology Group in May 2002 recorded PI and institutional demographics, current practice, and perceived barriers to and needs of PIs for the creation of research results programs. One hundred fifty (63.8%) PIs responded. Few institutions (n = 5) had established, comprehensive programs to offer the return of results. PIs indicated that major impediments to the implementation of such programs are the preparation of lay summaries, time constraints, the task of contacting participants, and potential distress for the participants. PIs identified the following facilitators to the establishment of a program in their own institution: lay summaries, web site, preparation of an oncologist's summary, and financial credits. There was no clear consensus as to when the results should be shared: 30% indicated after the study was closed and 24% indicated at the time of publication of results. A substantial proportion of respondents opposed or strongly opposed the implementation of a universal offering of results to research participants. Few Children's Oncology Group institutions have programs that offer the return of results to research participants. Significant barriers and facilitators to this process have been identified.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Informing Clinical Trial Participants About Study ResultsJAMA, 2002
- World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2000
- Medical malpractice: the effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice intentionsWestern Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Cancer Coverage in Mass-circulating Canadian Women’s MagazinesCanadian Journal of Public Health, 1999
- Second cancers after pediatric Hodgkin's disease.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1998
- The Australian Incident Monitoring Study in Intensive Care: AIMS-ICU. the Development and Evaluation of an Incident Reporting System in Intensive CareAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, 1996
- Psychological costs and benefits of predictive testing for Huntington's diseaseAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1994
- Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal actionThe Lancet, 1994
- Media Coverage of Cancer Risks May MisleadJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Diagnosis of Huntington disease: A model for the stages of psychological response based on experience of a predictive testing programAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1993