Subitizing and counting processes in young children
- 1 September 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 247-250
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1978.tb00327.x
Abstract
Children attending the first grade in school were instructed to tell the number of dots (1–9) presented on a screen. The response latencies were related to the number of dots by two different linear relations for each subject. The first of these had a slope of about 0.1 sec/dot, was applicable for the encoding of 1–3 dots, and was taken as an indication of a subitizing process. The second linear relation was applicable for 5–9 dots and had a slope of about 1.0 sec/dot reflecting the speed of a counting process. The average intersection between the functions was located at 3.22 dots. The results were compared with earlier investigations of adult subjects who on the average subitize 6 dots and count 1 dot in about 0.4 sec. It was subitizing process being higher for adults. If the encoding of a stimulus has not been terminated within about 1.5 sec for children and adults the stimulus has instead to be identified in either a counting or an estimating process.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Age differences in memory spanJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1977
- The Magic Number 4 ± 0: A New Look at Visual Numerosity JudgementsPerception, 1976
- On Children's Heuristics for Solving Simple AdditionsScandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1976
- An Experimental Test of Five Process Models for Subtraction.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975
- How Big Is a Chunk?Science, 1974
- A chronometric analysis of simple addition.Psychological Review, 1972
- Process of enumeration.Psychological Review, 1966
- The Subitizing and Counting of Visually Presented Fields of DotsThe Journal of Psychology, 1950
- Grouped Objects as a Concrete Basis for the Number IdeaThe Elementary School Teacher, 1912
- The Power of Numerical DiscriminationNature, 1871