Individual Differences and Test Administration Procedures: A Comparison of Fixed-Item, Computerized-Adaptive, and Self-Adapted Testing
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Measurement in Education
- Vol. 7 (1) , 53-79
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0701_5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-esteem and reactions to failure: The mediating role of overgeneralization.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- Correlates, Causes, Effects, and Treatment of Test AnxietyReview of Educational Research, 1988
- Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-Cognitive ViewAcademy of Management Review, 1987
- The General/Academic Self-Concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation ResearchReview of Educational Research, 1984
- Adaptive EAP Estimation of Ability in a Microcomputer EnvironmentApplied Psychological Measurement, 1982
- The Relationship Between Self and Achievement/Performance MeasuresReview of Educational Research, 1982
- Psychological considerations related to the development of computerized testing stationsBehavior Research Methods, 1981
- Effects of training on computerized test performance in the elderly.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1980
- The effect of a single experience of success or failure on test anxietyAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1968
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959