The feasibility of a street-intercept survey method in an African-American community.
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 87 (4) , 655-658
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.87.4.655
Abstract
This study evaluates the feasibility of a nonquota, street-intercept survey method that utilized random selection of interview sites. The street-intercept survey was compared with a random digit-dial telephone survey conducted in the same catchment area among African-American adults aged 18 or older. The street-intercept survey's response rate was 80.2%; residence rate, 85.3%; interview completion rate, 97.9%; interference rate, 4.0%; and yield rate, 2.5 interviews per interviewer per hour. The street-intercept method produced more representative distributions of age and sex than the random-digit-dial survey. The street-intercept method is a feasible alternative to traditional population survey methods and may provide better access to harder-to-reach segments of the urban population in a safe manner.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: a comparison of telephone and face to face surveys.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1994
- Comparison of three data collection methodologies for the study of young illicit drug usersAustralian Journal of Public Health, 1993
- Street Studies That Work and What They Show in New York CityJournal of Addictive Diseases, 1992
- AIDS survey methodology with black AmericansSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Telephone Versus Face-to-Face Interviewing for Household Drug Use SurveysInternational Journal of the Addictions, 1991
- Effects of Interview Mode on Self-Reported Drug UsePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1990
- Sampling Rare and Elusive PopulationsScience, 1988
- Telephone Surveys in Public Health ResearchMedical Care, 1986
- Household Health Interviews and Minority HealthMedical Care, 1980
- Some characteristics of inaccessible respondents in a telephone survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1975