Histamine‐induced inositol phospholipid breakdown in the longitudinal smooth muscle of guinea‐pig ileum
Open Access
- 1 June 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Pharmacology
- Vol. 85 (2) , 499-512
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.1985.tb08887.x
Abstract
1 The characteristics of histamine-stimulated inositol phospholipid breakdown in slices of guinea-pig ileal smooth muscle and cerebellum have been investigated. 2 In cerebellar slices the inhibition of the inositol phospholipid response to histamine by mepyramine was consistent with competitive antagonism of histamine H1-receptors. 3 In slices of the longitudinal smooth muscle of guinea-pig ileum, mepyramine produced only a weak inhibition of the response to histamine, at concentrations up to 1 μM. This was in striking contrast to the potent competitive antagonism of the H1-mediated contractile responses obtained with mepyramine in this tissue. 4 The H1-receptor antagonists (+)-chlorpheniramine and promethazine similarly had no effect on the EC50 value for histamine in guinea-pig ileum, while promethazine competitively antagonized the muscarinic receptor-mediated inositol phospholipid response in this tissue (Ka 3.6 × 107 M−1). 5 Cimetidine, on its own, did not significantly inhibit the inositol phosphate accumulation elicited by histamine in ileum. In the presence of 0.2 μM mepyramine, cimetidine (0.1 mM) produced a small parallel shift of the histamine concentration-response curve (Ka 3 × 104 M−1). This inhibition, however, was not consistent with antagonism of an H2-receptor-mediated response. 6 The effect of a range of histamine analogues on inositol phospholipid breakdown was determined. Dose-response curves were constructed and characterized in terms of the EC50, slope and maximal response attainable relative to histamine. 7 The H1-agonists, Nα, Nα-dimethylhistamine, Nα-methylhistamine, 2-pyridylethylamine and 2-thiazolylethylamine produced the largest accumulations of [3H]-inositol-1-phosphate. A very weak response was produced by the H2-selective agonist impromidine, while dimaprit (also H2-selective) was without significant effect. 8 Mepyramine appeared to antagonize competitively the response to the H1-selective agonist 2-pyridylethylamine. This was in contrast to the data obtained with other H1-agonists, where mepyramine produced only a small dextral shift of the agonist curves at low agonist concentrations and an increase in the Hill coefficient. This was particularly striking in the case of 2-methylhistamine. 9 The results suggest that an H1-receptor component in guinea-pig ileum, may coexist with a larger inositol phospholipid response to histamine which is independent of the activation of H1- or H2-receptors.This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Histamine Stimulation of Inositol 1‐Phosphate Accumulation in Lithium‐Treated Slices from Regions of Guinea Pig BrainJournal of Neurochemistry, 1984
- Inositol Phospholipid Hydrolysis in Rat Cerebral Cortical Slices: I. Receptor CharacterisationJournal of Neurochemistry, 1984
- Release of Ca2+ from a nonmitochondrial intracellular store in pancreatic acinar cells by inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphateNature, 1983
- Auto-inhibition of brain histamine release mediated by a novel class (H3) of histamine receptorNature, 1983
- Does phosphatidylinositol breakdown control the Ca2+-gating mechanism?Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 1981
- Phosphatidyldmositol hydrolysis: A multifunctional transducing mechanismMolecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 1981
- Recent hypotheses regarding the phosphatidylinositol effectLife Sciences, 1981
- Difference in the mechanisms by which acetylcholine and histamine interact with Ca2+ to contract the rabbit taenia coliJournal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, 1977
- Inositol phospholipids and cell surface receptor functionBiochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Biomembranes, 1975
- The uptake of atropine and related drugs by intestinal smooth muscle of the guinea-pig in relation to acetylcholine receptorsProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1965