Leveraging the potential of geospatial annotations for collaboration: a communication theory perspective
- 17 July 2007
- journal article
- other
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Geographical Information Science
- Vol. 21 (8) , 921-934
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13658810701377780
Abstract
This paper addresses a key problem in the development of visual‐analytical collaborative tools, how to design map‐based displays to enable productive group work. We introduce a group communication theory, the Collective Information Sharing (CIS) bias, and discuss how it relates to communicative goals that need to be considered when designing collaborative, visually enabled, spatial‐decision‐support tools. The CIS bias framework suggests that key goals for developing such tools should be: (a) the harnessing of a group's collective knowledge emerging from collaborative discussions and (b) reducing the repeat of information that has already been shared within the group. We propose that web‐accessible, map annotation tools are ideally suited to advancing these goals and outline how the CIS bias framework informs how geospatial annotation tools can maximize the potential of collaborative efforts. We offer design recommendations for annotation tools that function to: (a) facilitate access to and recall of geographically referenced discussion contributions, (b) document ideas for private as well as public discussion spaces, and (c) elicit all group members to contribute information in a given collaborative effort.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Design Considerations and Evaluation of a Collaborative, Spatio-Temporal Decision Support SystemTransactions in GIS, 2006
- Software support for annotation of visualized data using hand-drawn marksPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2005
- Developing a conceptual framework for visually-enabled geocollaborationInternational Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2004
- Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003
- Visualization Tools and Methods for Participatory Planning and DesignJournal of Urban Technology, 2001
- Using Web-Based Technologies and Geographic Information Systems in Community PlanningJournal of Urban Technology, 2000
- Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision-making groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1994
- Progress in Small Group ResearchAnnual Review of Psychology, 1990
- Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarizationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1977
- A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 1954