On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive Designs
- 1 March 2001
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Biometrics
- Vol. 57 (1) , 172-177
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341x.2001.00172.x
Abstract
Summary. Proschan and Hunsberger (1995, Biometrics51, 1315–1324) proposed a two-stage adaptive design that maintains the Type I error rate. For practical applications, a two-stage adaptive design is also required to achieve a desired statistical power while limiting the maximum overall sample size. In our proposal, a two-stage adaptive design is comprised of a main stage and an extension stage, where the main stage has sufficient power to reject the null under the anticipated effect size and the extension stage allows increasing the sample size in case the true effect size is smaller than anticipated. For statistical inference, methods for obtaining the overall adjusted p-value, point estimate and confidence intervals are developed. An exact two-stage test procedure is also outlined for robust inference.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Inference for Self‐Designing Clinical Trials with a One‐Sided HypothesisBiometrics, 1999
- Self-designing clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1998
- A Comparison of Two Methods for Adaptive Interim Analyses in Clinical TrialsPublished by JSTOR ,1998
- Designed Extension of Studies Based on Conditional PowerPublished by JSTOR ,1995
- Evaluation of Experiments with Adaptive Interim AnalysesPublished by JSTOR ,1994
- Sequential monitoring of clinical trials: The role of information and brownian motionStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Theoretical StatisticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1974