Researching Healing: A Psychologist's Perspective
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Vol. 6 (2) , 181-186
- https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2000.6.181
Abstract
This article suggests that a research agenda for healing should encompass qualitative issues of value and meaning as well as quantitative issues of clinical effectiveness. Patients themselves should play an active part in all stages of the research process in order to ensure that the questions addressed are relevant to the needs and wants of those who use healing. Research should address the issues of defining and specifying desired outcomes and clarifying the specific and nonspecific factors in the healing process as well as investigating the potential for harm in treatment and minimizing risk. Some specific research questions are raised. The healing community is challenged to develop a research agenda that is conceptually and methodologically rigorous, true to the holistic nature of complementary and alternative medicine, and retains the subversive edge of the healing traditions.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic systems theory as a paradigm for the study of change in psychotherapy: An application to cognitive therapy for depression.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998
- Primary care: core values Core values in a changing worldBMJ, 1998
- EditorialHealth Expectations, 1998
- Medicine based evidence, a prerequisite for evidence basedBMJ, 1997
- An exploration of help-seekers’ perceptions of the meaning of “help”Clinical Psychology Forum, 1996
- Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health surveyBMJ, 1996
- "Are all psychotherapies equivalent?"American Psychologist, 1986