Evaluation of the risk of noise-induced hearing loss among unscreened male industrial workers
- 28 January 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Acoustical Society of America (ASA) in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Vol. 113 (2) , 871-880
- https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1536635
Abstract
Variability in background risk and distribution of various risk factors for hearing loss may explain some of the diversity in excess risk of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). This paper examines the impact of various risk factors on excess risk estimates of NIHL using data from the 1968–1972 NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). Previous analyses of a subset of these data focused on 1172 highly “screened” workers. In the current analysis, an additional 894 white males (609 noise-exposed and 285 controls), who were excluded for various reasons (i.e., nonoccupational noise exposure, otologic or medical conditions affecting hearing, prior occupational noise exposure) have been added to assess excess risk of noise-induced material impairment in an unscreened population. Data are analyzed by age, duration of exposure, and sound level (8-h TWA) for four different definitions of noise-induced hearing impairment, defined as the binaural pure-tone average (PTA) hearing threshold level greater than 25 dB for the following frequencies: (a) 1–4 kHz (b) 1–3 kHz (c) 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz and (d) 3, 4, and 6 kHz Results indicate that populations with higher background risks of hearing loss may show lower excess risks attributable to noise relative to highly screened populations. Estimates of lifetime excess risk of hearing impairment were found to be significantly different between screened and unscreened population for noise levels greater than 90 dBA. Predicted age-related risk of material hearing impairment in the ONHS unscreened population was similar to that predicted from Annex B and C of ANSI S3.44 for ages less than 60 years. Results underscore the importance of understanding differential risk patterns for hearing loss and the use of appropriate reference (control) populations when evaluating risk of noise-induced hearing impairment among contemporary industrial populations.
Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cataract and hearing loss in a population-based study: the Beaver Dam studiesAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 2001
- The interactive effect of chronic exposure to noise and job complexity on changes in blood pressure and job satisfaction: A longitudinal study of industrial employees.Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2001
- Trends in Hearing Protector Usage in American Manufacturing from 1972 to 1989Aihaj Journal, 1998
- Interaction Between Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in the Pathogenesis of Sensorineural Hearing LossThe Laryngoscope, 1997
- Individual Susceptibility to Noise-Induced Hearing lossEar & Hearing, 1993
- The Relation of Hearing in the Elderly to the Presence of Cardiovascular Disease and Cardiovascular Risk FactorsJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 1993
- A Report on the Status of Research on the Cardiovascular Effects of NoiseNoise Control Engineering Journal, 1984
- Normal Hearing Threshold Determined by Manual and Self-Recording TechniquesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1966
- Noise Control - Percent of Population ProtectedInternational Audiology, 1966
- Comparison of the Auditory Threshold as Measured by Individual Pure Tone and by Békésy AudiometryThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1957