Objective Moral Judgment in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Vol. 19 (1) , 78-95
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002188019001006
Abstract
Rest's Defining Issues Test was administered to subjects in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England. It was found that the mean profile and age correlation pattern of the stage scores in the Hong Kong and England samples were consistent with the theoretical prediction. Results of principal components analysis of the stage scores in Hong Kong and England samples also provided fairly good support to the claim of an ordered sequence of Kohlberg's stages measured by the Defining Issues Test. However, the results of the Mainland China Study were less obvious. A cultural difference in perceiving the Stage 4 (S4) issue-statements was found between the Hong Kong Chinese and the English subjects. The Chinese tended to regard the S4 statements as more similar to the S5 and S6 ones, while the English tended to regard the S4 statements as more similar to the S2 and S3 ones.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consistency of Stage Structure in Objective Moral Judgment across Different SamplesPsychological Reports, 1985
- Moral Development in Rural and Urban KoreaJournal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1984
- Stage structure in objective moral judgments.Developmental Psychology, 1978
- On a Metric, Unidimensional Unfolding Model for Attitudinal and Developmental DataPsychometrika, 1977
- The reliability, validity, and design of the Defining Issues Test.Developmental Psychology, 1977
- Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas: An objective measure of development.Developmental Psychology, 1974
- FROM IS TO OUGHT: How to Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy and Get Away with It in the Study of Moral DevelopmentPublished by Elsevier ,1971