The Santer era: the European Commission in normative, historical and theoretical perspective
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of European Public Policy
- Vol. 6 (1) , 46-65
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343793
Abstract
This article assesses the evolution of the European Commission's role, power and effectiveness in the post-Delors era. It develops four main arguments. First, the performance of the Commission should be judged by its ability to further the European Union's (EU's) basic objectives, defend the 'Community interest', offer leadership, and operate efficiently. Second, the early Delors Commissions were far more an exception in their strength than is Santer's in its weakness. Third, Santer promises to leave a legacy of a better managed Commission, but one that is also more fragmented and riven by sectoral and national rivalries. Fourth, theories of EU governance must be able to capture the 'actor-based' nature of EU policy-making, the lack of any dichotomy between the interests of 'national governments' and 'EU institutions', and the determinant effect of the political and economic environment in which the EU operates.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Choice for EuropePublished by Taylor & Francis ,2013
- Decision-Making in the European UnionPublished by Bloomsbury Academic ,1999
- The Commission as an Actor: An Anthropologist’s ViewPublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1997
- European Commissioners 1952–1995: National Routes to a European ElitePublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- Identities in the European CommissionPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- The Council of MinistersPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- At the Heart of the UnionPublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- People Who Run EuropePublished by Oxford University Press (OUP) ,1996
- The European Challenges Post-1992Published by Edward Elgar Publishing ,1993