Practical performance of the and comparison with other dissipative algorithms in structural dynamics
- 1 March 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering
- Vol. 67 (1) , 87-110
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90070-9
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- A unified set of single step algorithms. Part 4: Backward error analysis applied to the solution of the dynamic vibration equationInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1986
- Comparison of Hilber‐Hughes‐Taylor and Bossak ‘α‐methods’ for the numerical integration of vibration equationsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1983
- The ρ‐family of algorithms for time‐step integration with improved numerical dissipationEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1982
- An alpha modification of Newmark's methodInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1980
- Finite-Element Methods for Nonlinear Elastodynamics Which Conserve EnergyJournal of Applied Mechanics, 1978
- Collocation, dissipation and [overshoot] for time integration schemes in structural dynamicsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1978
- Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamicsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1977
- A note on the stability of Newmark's algorithm in nonlinear structural dynamicsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1977
- Stability, convergence and growth and decay of energy of the average acceleration method in nonlinear structural dynamicsComputers & Structures, 1976
- Stability and accuracy analysis of direct integration methodsEarthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1972