COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS PART II: GRASSLAND
- 1 June 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Soil Science
- Vol. 29 (2) , 277-285
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1978.tb02058.x
Abstract
Summary: Superphosphate, granular and powdered basic slag, and normally and very finely ground Gafsa rock phosphate were compared as sources of phosphorus for established grassland under a wide range of conditions in England and Wales. Superphosphate and both forms of basic slag were about equally effective in all cases. Gafsa rock phosphate was a useful form of phosphate for grassland where the soil pH value was below about 6.0, but it was much less effective and slower acting on neutral soils or where lime had recently been applied. Very finely ground rock phosphate was only slightly more effective than the normally ground form, and their value as phosphatic fertilizers depended primarily on soil pH rather than on rainfall.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT FORMS OF PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZERS PART I: RAPE AND SWEDESEuropean Journal of Soil Science, 1975
- DISSOLUTION OF FLUORAPATITE BY PLANT ROOTSSoil Science, 1972
- Field experiments on phosphate fertilizers. A joint investigationThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1959
- Field experiments on phosphate fertilizers: A joint investigationThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1956