Some Conditions under Which Integrated Computer-Based Training Software Can Facilitate Learning
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Educational Computing Research
- Vol. 15 (4) , 345-367
- https://doi.org/10.2190/mg7x-4j8n-ckyr-p06t
Abstract
When students are required to learn a new computer application program, frequently they need to split their attention between material in a manual and material on the screen because neither is self-contained. Previous work has indicated that split-attention can interfere with learning because the need to mentally integrate material imposes an extraneous cognitive load. Alternatively, even if the screen-based material is self-contained, the material of a redundant manual, if processed by learners, can also impose an extraneous cognitive load. Under these circumstances, learning may be facilitated by the use of self-contained, screen-based material alone. In Experiment 1, the first author developed a windows spreadsheet, computer-based training package with an integrated format, to test these hypotheses. The split-attention effect was investigated by comparing the performance of a group of students using the integrated computer-based training software with that of a group using a conventional manual plus the computer software to be learned. The redundancy effect was investigated by comparing a group using the computer-based training software with a group using the same computer-based training software plus a hard-copy of this training software. Results from Experiment 1 supported the above cognitive load hypotheses. Specifically, in areas of high information complexity, the integrated computer-based training software group clearly outperformed both the conventional manual plus computer software group, and the computer-based training software plus hard-copy group, thus demonstrating both split-attention and redundancy effects. Experiment 2 partially replicated this result, as well as providing support for a cognitive load explanation of results by measuring mental load. In the light of these findings and previous research, it is suggested that cognitive load is a major factor in all aspects of instructional design. Computer training software that reduces extraneous cognitive load by adopting integrated computer-based training formats can considerably facilitate learning.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasksEducational Psychology Review, 1994
- Why Some Material Is Difficult to LearnCognition and Instruction, 1994
- Some cognitive processes and their consequences for the organisation and presentation of informationAustralian Journal of Psychology, 1993
- Cognitive load effects in a primary-school geometry taskLearning and Instruction, 1993
- The instructive animation: Helping students build connections between words and pictures in multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992
- Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992
- Evidence for Cognitive Load TheoryCognition and Instruction, 1991
- Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of InstructionCognition and Instruction, 1991
- Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1990
- Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on LearningCognitive Science, 1988