Strategy for a priori Selection of Judges in a Product-Centered Approach to Assessment of Creativity
- 1 February 1976
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 42 (1) , 107-115
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1976.42.1.107
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to develop a procedure for the a priori selection of judges of creative products which could be employed irrespective of the field in which the products occur. Experts in art, science, writing, and music responded, via a modified Q-sort, to multiple criteria for a creative product. Obverse factor-analytic techniques were employed to reduce the rank of the subject covariance matrix and determine specific judge types. Sets of judges, with homogeneous perceptions of criteria for a creative product, were determined, and, it was shown that homogeneity of judgment was independent of discipline. Furthermore, the method appeared relevant to any situation in which judges are required and for which criteria may be delineated.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- COGNITIVE, MOTIVATIONAL AND TEMPERAMENTAL INDICANTS OF CREATIVITY AND INTELLIGENCE1Journal of Educational Measurement, 1972
- Some Factors Related to Architectural Creativity in Graduating Architecture StudentsThe Journal of General Psychology, 1969
- Some Contributions to Maximum Likelihood Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1967
- Attitudes Toward Education and Perceptions of Teacher Characteristics: A Q StudyAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1966
- The person, the product, and the response: conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity1Journal of Personality, 1965
- Alpha Factor AnalysisPsychometrika, 1965
- THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 1963
- Q Methodology: An Application to Group PhenomenaEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1961
- The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysisPsychometrika, 1958
- Factors of importance for creativityJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1956