Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment
Top Cited Papers
- 3 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 110 (1) , 143-152
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-007-9686-5
Abstract
Purpose To compare the neuropsychological functioning of breast cancer patients with invasive cancer and noninvasive cancer prior to adjuvant treatment. Patients and Methods Breast cancer patients (N = 132) with invasive (Stages 1–3, N = 110, age = 54.1 ± 8.1) or noninvasive (Stage 0, N = 22, age = 55.8 ± 8.0) disease completed a battery of neuropsychological and psychological instruments following surgery but prior to initiation of chemotherapy, radiation or hormonal therapy. Matched healthy controls (N = 45, age = 52.9 ± 10.0) completed the same battery of instruments. For the patients, data on menstrual status, type of surgery, time of general anesthesia, CBC and platelets, nutritional status (B12 and folate), and thyroid function were collected. Results Comparison of mean neuropsychological test scores revealed that all groups scored within the normal range; however, patients with Stage 1–3 cancer scored significantly lower than healthy controls on the Reaction Time domain (p = 0.005). Using a definition of lower than expected cognitive performance that corrected for misclassification error, Stage 1–3 patients were significantly (p = 0.002) more likely to be classified as having lower than expected overall cognitive performance (22%) as compared to Stage 0 patients (0%) and healthy controls (4%). No differences were observed between patients classified as having lower than expected cognitive performance compared to those classified as normal performance on measures of depression, anxiety, fatigue, menstrual status, surgery/anesthesia or any of the blood work parameters. Conclusion Patients with Stage 1–3 breast cancer were more likely to be classified as having lower than expected cognitive performance prior to adjuvant treatment as compared to Stage 0 patients and healthy controls, although correction for misclassification error produced a lower rate than previously reported.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changesNature Reviews Cancer, 2007
- Fatigue, Menopausal Symptoms, and Cognitive Function in Women After Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: 1- and 2-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Controlled StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- The (mis)classification of chemo-fog – methodological inconsistencies in the investigation of cognitive impairment after chemotherapyBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2005
- Cancer as a Risk Factor for Long-Term Cognitive Deficits and DementiaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Cancer as a Risk Factor for Dementia: A House Built on Shifting SandJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Basal, oxidative and alkylative DNA damage, DNA repair efficacy and mutagen sensitivity in breast cancerMutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 2004
- The cognitive sequelae of standard‐dose adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast carcinomaCancer, 2004
- Fatigue in women treated with bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer: A comparison with women with no history of cancerSupportive Care in Cancer, 1997
- Development and validation of a multiple ability self-report questionnaireJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1994
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977