Leadership: An Alienating Social Myth?
- 1 February 1992
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Human Relations
- Vol. 45 (2) , 113-129
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204500201
Abstract
The social construct of leadership is viewed as a myth that functions to reinforce existing social beliefs and structures about the necessity of hierarchy and leaders in organizations. The dynamics of the leadership myth in terms of its consequences for alienation characterized by intellectual and emotional deskilling is discussed. A trend toward massive deskilling on a societal scale is viewed as indicated by the current emergence of magical wishes for omnipotent leaders demonstrating a sense of helplessness and despair in being able to personally initiate and create less alienating social forms for the workplace. The types of experimentation required for refraining socially constructed meanings of leadership are explored, with emphasis placed on the role of heightened awareness of covert and undiscussable power and authority dynamics in an organizational context.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experiences in GroupsPublished by Taylor & Francis ,2003
- Change in the Small Group: A Dissipative Structure PerspectiveHuman Relations, 1991
- The Organizational Fool: Balancing a Leader's HubrisHuman Relations, 1990
- The Mythology of the Leader Role in Small GroupsSmall Group Behavior, 1986
- The Group Psychology of Mass Madness: JonestownPolitical Psychology, 1983
- Group Process DevelopmentSmall Group Behavior, 1982
- Leadership: The Management of MeaningThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1982
- An Interview with Max PagesThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1974
- New concepts in the evolution of complexitySynthese, 1970
- The incompleteness of social-psychological theory: Examples from small group, cognitive consistency, and attribution research.American Psychologist, 1969