Effects of Group Size Uncertainty and Protocol of Play in a Common Pool Resource Dilemma
- 25 July 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Vol. 6 (3) , 265-283
- https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302030063004
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of group size uncertainty in a single-stage step-level common pool resource dilemma under a sequential (SEQ) and a Self-paced Sequential (SPS) protocol of play. In the uncertain group size condition, participants were told that their group was equally likely to be any size between three and seven persons. In the certain group size condition, the group size was always five. In the SEQ protocol, decisions were made in a pre-specified order such that each player knew his or her position in the sequence, as well as the combined requests of all the preceding players in the sequence. In the SPS protocol, participants could choose when to make their decisions. In both protocols, we replicated the position effects—individual requests are inversely related to the players' positions in the sequence with the first mover requesting most, and the last mover requesting the least. We also found that the position effect was stronger in SEQ than in SPS, and when group size was certain than when it was not. Relative to group size certainty, group size uncertainty decreased total requests and increased provision rates.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- A model of sequential effects in common pool resource dilemmasJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2002
- Individual differences in cooperation in a circular public goods gameEuropean Journal of Personality, 2001
- Desirability bias among professional investment managers: some evidence from expertsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1997
- Attributions about self and others in commons dilemmasEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1996
- Common Pool Resource Dilemmas under Uncertainty: Qualitative Tests of Equilibrium SolutionsGames and Economic Behavior, 1995
- The relationship between the illusion of control and the desirability biasJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1995
- Coordination Rules in Asymmetric Social Dilemmas: A Comparison between Public Good Dilemmas and Resource DilemmasJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1995
- Passion, Preference, and Predictability in Judgmental ForecastingPsychological Reports, 1992
- Resource dilemmas with environmental uncertainty and asymmetric playersEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1990
- The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N‐person multi‐stage mixed‐motive gameEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1984