UTILITARIANISM AND PRIORITARIANISM II
Open Access
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Economics and Philosophy
- Vol. 24 (01) , 1-33
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s026626710800165x
Abstract
The priority view has become very popular in moral philosophy, but there is a serious question about how it should be formalized. The most natural formalization leads to ex post prioritarianism, which results from adding expected utility theory to the main ideas of the priority view. But ex post prioritarianism entails a claim which is too implausible for it to be a serious competitor to utilitarianism. In fact, ex post prioritarianism was probably never a genuine alternative to utilitarianism in the first place. By contrast, ex ante prioritarianism is defensible. But its motivation is very different from the usual rationales offered for the priority view. Given the untenability of ex post prioritarianism, it is more natural for most friends of the priority view to revert to utilitarianism.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- MEASURING LIFE'S GOODNESSPhilosophical Books, 2007
- UTILITARIANISM AND PRIORITARIANISM IEconomics and Philosophy, 2006
- THE VALUE OF EQUALITYEconomics and Philosophy, 2003
- Prioritarianism for ProspectsUtilitas, 2002
- Measuring the size of a benefit and its moral weight On the significance of John Broome's: “Interpersonal Addition Theorem”1Theoria, 1995
- Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be madePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1991
- Nonlinear Social Welfare Functions: A Rejoinder to Professor SenPublished by Springer Nature ,1977
- Counterpart Theory and Quantified Modal LogicThe Journal of Philosophy, 1968
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility: CommentJournal of Political Economy, 1967
- Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of UtilityJournal of Political Economy, 1955