Environmental and Sustainability Factors Associated With Next-Generation Biofuels in the U.S.: What Do We Really Know?
- 27 May 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Environmental Science & Technology
- Vol. 43 (13) , 4763-4775
- https://doi.org/10.1021/es900250d
Abstract
In this paper, we assess what is known or anticipated about environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels relative to the primary conventional biofuels (i.e., corn grain-based ethanol and soybean-based diesel) in the United States during feedstock production and conversion processes. Factors considered include greenhouse (GHG) emissions, air pollutant emissions, soil health and quality, water use and water quality, wastewater and solid waste streams, and biodiversity and land-use changes. Based on our review of the available literature, we find that the production of next-generation feedstocks in the U.S. (e.g., municipal solid waste, forest residues, dedicated energy crops, microalgae) are expected to fare better than corn-grain or soybean production on most of these factors, although the magnitude of these differences may vary significantly among feedstocks. Ethanol produced using a biochemical or thermochemical conversion platform is expected to result in fewer GHG and air pollutant emissions, but to have similar or potentially greater water demands and solid waste streams than conventional ethanol biorefineries in the U.S. However, these conversion-related differences are likely to be small, particularly relative to those associated with feedstock production. Modeling performed for illustrative purposes and to allow for standardized quantitative comparisons across feedstocks and conversion technologies generally confirms the findings from the literature. Despite current expectations, significant uncertainty remains regarding how well next-generation biofuels will fare on different environmental and sustainability factors when produced on a commercial scale in the U.S. Additional research is needed in several broad areas including quantifying impacts, designing standardized metrics and approaches, and developing decision-support tools to identify and quantify environmental trade-offs and ensure sustainable biofuels production.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasolineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Good policy follows good science: using criteria and indicators for assessing sustainable biofuel productionEcotoxicology, 2008
- Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of MiscanthusGlobal Change Biology, 2008
- Towards Sustainable Production of Biofuels from MicroalgaeInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2008
- Microalgal triacylglycerols as feedstocks for biofuel production: perspectives and advancesThe Plant Journal, 2008
- Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi RiverProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Biodiesel from microalgaeBiotechnology Advances, 2007
- Energy and Emission Benefits of Alternative Transportation Liquid Fuels Derived from Switchgrass: A Fuel Life Cycle AssessmentBiotechnology Progress, 2006
- Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuelsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United StatesBiomass and Bioenergy, 2005