Some methodological problems in estimating incidence and prevalence in child sexual abuse research
- 1 November 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Sex Research
- Vol. 37 (4) , 305-314
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490009552052
Abstract
Research into child sexual abuse is fraught with methodological problems. This paper provides an overview of some common aspects of them. Definitional inconsistencies are frequent, including that of child sexual abuse itself and what age limits define a child. Other methodological difficulties include determining the number of children sexually abused in any period of time, choice of sample, the type and number of questions asked, factors such as publicity associated with the historical period, and estimates of the rate of increase of child sexual abuse over time. It is suggested that greater consistency, particularly of definition, would assist comparative conclusions to be made with less ambiguity and greater validity.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measurement of women's child sexual abuse experiences: An empirical demonstration of the impact of choice of measure on estimates of incidence rates and of relationships with pathologyThe Journal of Sex Research, 1998
- A meta‐analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuseThe Journal of Sex Research, 1997
- Male victims of child sexual abuseTRADITION- A JOURNAL OF ORTHODOX JEWISH THOUGHT, 1996
- Incidence and Prevalence of Child Sexual AbuseJournal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1995
- The international epidemiology of child sexual abuseChild Abuse & Neglect, 1994
- Problems of Research in Male Child Sexual AbuseJournal of Child Sexual Abuse, 1993
- Sexual Abuse in Childhood:Journal of Social Work & Human Sexuality, 1986
- Father–daughter incest.Professional Psychology, 1981
- Physician reporting of sexual abuse of childrenJAMA, 1978
- Female Child Victims of Sex OffensesSocial Problems, 1965