Receptive Field Organization Determines Pyramidal Cell Stimulus-Encoding Capability and Spatial Stimulus Selectivity
- 1 June 2002
- journal article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 22 (11) , 4577-4590
- https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.22-11-04577.2002
Abstract
Sensory systems must operate over a wide range of spatial scales, and single neuron receptive field (RF) organization may contribute to the ability of a neuron to encode information about stimuli having different spatial characteristics. Here we relate the RF organization of sensory neurons to their ability to encode time-varying stimuli, using linear stimulus estimation, measures of information transfer, and more conventional analysis techniques. The electrosensory systems of weakly electric fish are recognized as very tractable model systems for studies of sensory processing because behaviorally relevant stimuli are generated easily and related to known behaviors and because a detailed anatomical database is available to guide the design and interpretation of experiments. Receptive fields of neurons within the first central electrosensory-processing region have an antagonistic center–surround organization; the RF area varies with cell type, with dendritic morphology, and with the spontaneous activity patterns of the cell. Functional consequences of variations in center–surround organization were assessed by comparing responses to two spatial stimulus patterns that mimic naturalistic stimuli and that provide input to the center alone or to the center plus surround. Measures of the quality of stimulus estimation (coding fraction) and information transmission (mutual information) as well as traditional measures of responsiveness consistently demonstrate that, for cells having large surrounds, the activation of both receptive field components degrades the ability to encode time-varying stimuli. The loss of coding efficiency with center–surround stimulation probably results from cancellation of balanced excitatory and inhibitory inputs. However, cells with small surrounds relative to centers perform well under all spatial stimulus regimes.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neuronal Tuning: To Sharpen or Broaden?Neural Computation, 1999
- From stimulus encoding to feature extraction in weakly electric fishNature, 1996
- The electric organ discharges of the gymnotiform fishes: I. Apteronotus leptorhynchusJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1996
- Correlating gamma‐aminobutyric acidergic circuits and sensory function in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of a gymnotiform fishJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1994
- Ultrastructural studies of physiologically identified electrosensory afferent synapses in the gymnotiform fish, EigenmanniaJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1987
- The nucleus praeeminentialis: A Golgi study of a feedback center in the electrosensory system of gymnotid fishJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1983
- ElectrolocationJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1981
- ElectrolocationJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1981
- The cytology of the posterior lateral line lobe of high‐frequency weakly electric fish (gymnotidae): Dendritic differentiation and synaptic specificity in a simple cortexJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1981
- The posterior lateral line lobe of certain gymnotoid fish: Quantitative light microscopyJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1979