Patterns of Cognitive Development in Very Low Birth Weight Children During the First Six Years of Life
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
- Vol. 99 (3) , 383-389
- https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.99.3.383
Abstract
Background. Cognitive development in very low birth weight (VLBW, ≤1500 g) infants typically has been reported based on mean endpoints in cross-sectional studies. These overall group means mask individual patterns of cognitive development. Given the heterogeneity of VLBW infants, it is important to identify individual patterns of development and the factors associated with the different patterns. Objective. We sought to determine individual patterns of cognitive development over the first 6 years in VLBW children and to examine the relative influence of selected biomedical and sociodemographic factors on these patterns. Method. VLBW infants (N = 203) were followed from birth to six years. Cognitive scores were obtained at four yearly intervals, and biomedical and social data were obtained beginning with the neonatal period. Cluster analysis was used to identify individual patterns of cognitive development. Results. Five developmental patterns were identified: average–stable (13% of the sample); average–declined to low average (24% of the sample); average–declined to below average (43% of the sample); very low–increased to low average (8% of the sample); and very low–stable (12% of the sample). The patterns could be differentiated by several biomedical factors, including birth weight, gestational age, neonatal health, and 1-year assessments of neurological status and head circumference, as well as by level of maternal education. In particular, abnormal neurological status at 1 year was associated with a pattern of very low stable scores, and a suspicious status was associated with a pattern of improving cognitive development. Maternal education was influential among children born at the upper end of the VLBW range, who had a more favorable set of biomedical factors. Conclusions. Biomedical factors are of major importance for the cognitive development of VLBW infants, and their influence increases as birth weight declines. Differences in neurological integrity at 1 year were an important indicator of different patterns of cognitive development, especially for infants at the lower end of the VLBW range.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cognitive and Neurologic Development of the Premature, Small for Gestational Age Infant Through Age 6: Comparison by Birth Weight and Gestational AgePediatrics, 1996
- Patterns of low-birth-weight children's cognitive development.Developmental Psychology, 1993
- Risk factors for major neurodevelopmental impairments and need for special education resources in extremely premature infantsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1991
- Long-term Follow-up of Infants Discharged From Neonatal Intensive Care UnitsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1989
- Antecedents of School Problems in Children Born PretermJournal of Pediatric Psychology, 1988
- Very Low Birthweight: A Long-term Developmental Impairment?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1988
- Methodology Review: Clustering MethodsApplied Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Effects of Brain Growth During Infancy on Intelligence Quotient at 3 Years of AgePediatrics, 1986
- Abnormal Neurologic Signs in the First Year of Life in Low‐birthweight Infants: Possible Prognostic SignificanceDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1972
- Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: Standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeksPublished by Elsevier ,1969