How do parents of babies interpret qualitative expressions of probability?
- 1 May 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Vol. 65 (5) , 520-523
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.65.5.520
Abstract
Eighty one very low birthweight survivors with cerebral palsy were matched with controls by sex, gestational age, and place of birth. Using discriminant analysis, the perinatal profiles for infants with cerebral palsy and their controls were shown to differ significantly. When infants with various types of cerebral palsy were analysed with their controls the discriminating variables differed. Diplegic infants could be differentiated from controls on antenatal variables alone, but significant discrimination of hemiplegic and quadriplegic infants required the addition of postnatal variables. Cranial ultrasound appearances differed appreciably between types of cerebral palsy. Future studies should differentiate between types of cerebral palsy and include ultrasound data. Cerebral palsy in very low birthweight infants is unlikely to prove a useful outcome indicator for neonatal intensive care.This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Medical Professionals Evaluate Expressions of ProbabilityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Numbers are better than words: Verbal specifications of frequency have no place in medicineThe American Journal of Medicine, 1983
- How probable is probable? A numerical translation of verbal probability expressionsJournal of Forecasting, 1982
- Between Never and AlwaysNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981
- WHAT DO WE MEAN BY "USUALLY"?The Lancet, 1980
- Recertification: Will We Retreat?New England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Expressions of Probability: Words and NumbersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Sometimes frequently means seldom: Context effects in the interpretation of quantitative expressionsJournal of Research in Personality, 1974
- Stability in meanings for quantitative terms: A comparison over 20 yearsQuarterly Journal of Speech, 1963
- A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF MEANINGBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958