Pay for Performance? Government Regulation and the Structure of Compensation Contracts
Preprint
- 1 January 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
- Vol. 62 (3)
- https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.60956
Abstract
In 1992-1993, the SEC required enhanced disclosure on executive compensation and Congress enacted tax legislation, i.e. Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m), liKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Taxation of Executive CompensationPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- THE DESIGN OF MULTI-YEAR STOCK OPTION PLANSJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1999
- Are CEOs Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Discretion in Financial Reporting: The Voluntary Disclosure of Compensation Peer Groups in Proxy Statement Performance Graphs*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1998
- MEASURING CORPORATE TAX RATES AND TAX INCENTIVES: A NEW APPROACHJournal of Applied Corporate Finance, 1998
- Proxies for the corporate marginal tax rateJournal of Financial Economics, 1996
- Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earningsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1995
- Bank CEO Pay-Performance Relations and the Effects of DeregulationThe Journal of Business, 1995
- Interindustry Differences in the Relation between Compensation and Firm Performance VariablesJournal of Accounting Research, 1991
- Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performanceJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1985