Learning Disability and the History of Science: Paradigm or Paradox?
- 1 July 1985
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Remedial and Special Education
- Vol. 6 (4) , 12-24
- https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258500600404
Abstract
The field of learning disabilities faces a fundamental problem of providing a definition acceptable to a broad constituency. In attempting to explain why this situation exists, we offer arguments based upon concepts from the history and philosophy of science. I t is concluded that learning disability is a victim of its own history, and a breaking from the past is necessary for the definitional problem to move closer to resolution. Few of us take the pains to study the origin of our cherished convictions; indeed, we have a natural repugnance to so doing. We like to continue to believe what we have been accustomed to accept as true, and the resentment aroused when doubt is cast upon any of our assumptions leads us to seek every manner of excuse for clinging to them. -J. H. RobinsonKeywords
This publication has 109 references indexed in Scilit:
- Academic Deficits in Emotionally Disturbed Children RevisitedJournal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 1983
- Diagnosing DyslexiaAmerican Journal of Diseases of Children, 1982
- LEARNING DISABILITY SUBTYPES: A ReviewPublished by Elsevier ,1981
- The Structure and Dynamics of TheoriesPublished by Springer Nature ,1976
- The Myth of Mental IllnessPublished by Elsevier ,1974
- Scientific Strategies and Historical ChangePublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- Medical and psychological correlates in children with learning disabilitiesThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1971
- Differential diagnosis of dyslexia, minimal brain damage and emotional disturbances in childrenPsychology in the Schools, 1970
- Does the Distinction between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water?Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970
- Against ‘Normal Science’Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1970