An Integrated Physical Dispersion and Behavioral Response Model for Risk Assessment of Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD) Events
- 28 February 2006
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 26 (2) , 501-514
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00742.x
Abstract
A radiological dispersion device (RDD) or "dirty" bomb is a conventional explosive wrapped in radiological material. Terrorists may use an RDD to disperse radioactive material across a populated area, causing casualties and/or economic damage. Nearly all risk assessment models for RDDs make unrealistic assumptions about public behavior in their health assessments, including assumptions that the public would stand outside in a single location indefinitely. In this article, we describe an approach for assessing the risks of RDD events incorporating both physical dispersion and behavioral response variables. The general approach is tested using the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania as a case study. Atmospheric models simulate an RDD attack and its likely fallout, while radiation exposure models assess fatal cancer risk. We model different geographical distributions of the population based on time of day. We evaluate aggregate health impacts for different public responses (i.e., sheltering-in-place, evacuating). We find that current RDD models in use can be improved with the integration of behavioral components. Using the results from the model, we show how risk varies across several behavioral and physical variables. We show that the best policy to recommend to the public depends on many different variables, such as the amount of trauma at ground zero, the capability of emergency responders to get trauma victims to local hospitals quickly and efficiently, how quickly evacuations can take place in the city, and the amount of shielding available for shelterers. Using a parametric analysis, we develop behaviorally realistic risk assessments, we identify variables that can affect an optimal risk reduction policy, and we find that decision making can be improved by evaluating the tradeoff between trauma and cancer fatalities for various RDD scenarios before they occur.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evacuation Priorities in Mass Casualty Terror-Related EventsAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Evaluating the Success of Terror Risk CommunicationsBiosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2003
- Weapons of Mass DisruptionScientific American, 2002
- Validation and application of obstacle-resolving urban dispersion modelsAtmospheric Environment, 2002
- The hazard posed by depleted uranium munitionsScience & Global Security, 2000
- Does out-of-hospital EMS time affect trauma survival?The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1995
- Time Dependence of the 137Cs Resuspension Factor on the Romanian Territory After the Chernobyl AccidentHealth Physics, 1994
- IMPACT OF ON-SITE CARE, PREHOSPITAL TIME, AND LEVEL OF IN-HOSPITAL CARE ON SURVIVAL IN SEVERELY INJURED PATIENTSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- Boundary-layer parameterizations for applied dispersion modeling over urban areasBoundary-Layer Meteorology, 1992
- Casualties from Terrorist BombingsPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1983