The Relational Determination of Length Illusions and Length Aftereffects
- 1 April 1979
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 8 (2) , 187-197
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p080187
Abstract
When two lines were presented simultaneously, in an illusion paradigm, the judged length of one of the lines (the focal line) assimilated toward the length of the contextual line. When the lines were presented sequentially, in an aftereffect paradigm, the apparent length of the focal line was displaced away from the length of a previously presented contextual line (i.e. contrast). The largest effects obtained at inverse contextual-to-focal length ratios: 1·67:1 for contextual lines longer than the focal line and 0·60:1 for contextual lines shorter than the focal line. Overestimation of focal length was larger than underestimation for both illusions and aftereffects despite the fact that identical stimuli produced effects in opposite directions in the two paradigms. Results were discussed in terms of a neural length-coding model and were related to visual size constancy.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contextual influence on judgments of linear extent.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- Comparative judgment: Tests of two theories using the Baldwin figure.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1977
- Interactions between orientations in human visionExperimental Brain Research, 1973
- A comparison of five methods of illusion measurementBehavior Research Methods, 1972
- Significance of Intracortical Inhibition in the Visual CortexNature New Biology, 1972
- Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature.Psychological Review, 1971
- Size Adaptation: A New AftereffectScience, 1969
- On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal imagesThe Journal of Physiology, 1969
- THE REVERSE MÜLLER‐LYER ILLUSION AND ‘ENCLOSURE’British Journal of Psychology, 1968
- Evidence for a Physiological Explanation of the Waterfall Phenomenon and Figural After-effectsNature, 1963