Findings from Phase 2 of the SPICE trials
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Software Process: Improvement and Practice
- Vol. 6 (4) , 205-242
- https://doi.org/10.1002/spip.146
Abstract
The international SPICE (Software Process Improvement and Capability dEtermination) project was set up to support the development of the ISO/IEC 15504 standard for software process assessment (SPA). The project mounted a set of trials to validate the emerging standard against the goals and requirements defined at the start of the SPICE project and to verify the consistency and usability of its component parts. A considerable number of empirical evaluation studies have been conducted during the Phase 2 SPICE Trials based on ISO/IEC PDTR 15504 (between September 1996 and June 1998). Such an exercise is unprecedented in the software engineering standards community and it provides a unique opportunity for empirical validation. The purpose of this paper is to present major parts of the findings of the empirical studies conducted as part of the SPICE Project during Phase 2 of the SPICE Trials. The topics covered in this paper include (i) investigation into reasons for performing SPAs, (ii) evaluation of the internal consistency of the capability dimension, (iii) use of interrater agreement as a measure of the reliability of assessments, (iv) evaluation of the predictive validity of process capability, (v) evaluation of an exemplar model (Part 5), (vi) identification of factors influencing assessor effort, and (vii) empirical comparison between ISO/IEC PDTR 15504 and ISO 9001. Major lessons learned as well as future research directions are summarized on the strengths and weaknesses of ISO/IEC 15505. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measures of software development process capabilityJournal of Systems and Software, 2000
- Multi-method research: An empirical investigation of object-oriented technologyJournal of Systems and Software, 1999
- Process assessment considered wastefulCommunications of the ACM, 1997
- User participation in the requirements engineering process: An empirical studyRequirements Engineering, 1996
- How ISO 9001 compares with the CMMIEEE Software, 1995
- A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for HeteroskedasticityEconometrica, 1980
- Prediction, Linear Regression and the Minimum Sum of Relative ErrorsTechnometrics, 1977
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 1951