Influences of practice characteristics on prescribing in fundholding and non-fundholding general practices: an observational study
- 7 September 1996
- Vol. 313 (7057) , 595-599
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7057.595
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the variation in prescribing among general practices by examining the contribution to this variation of fundholding, training status, partnership status, and the level of deprivation in the practice population and to investigate the extent to which fundholding has been responsible for any changes in prescribing. Design: Analysis of prescribing data (PACT) for the years 1990-1 (before fundholding) and 1993-4 (after fundholding). Use of multiple linear regressions to investigate the variation among practices in total prescribing costs (net ingredient cost per prescribing unit), prescribing volume (items per 1000 prescribing units), and mean cost per item in each of the two years and also the change in these variables between years. Setting: Former Mersey region. Subjects: 384 practices. Results: The models developed explained the variation in cost per item (43% of variation explained for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) and prescribing volume (34% for 1990-1, 38% for 1993-4) better than the variation in total prescribing costs (3% for 1990-1, 7% for 1993-4). The models developed to explain the change in these variables between years did not explain more than 10% of the variation. Most of the explained variation in the change in total prescribing costs was accounted for by fundholding. Of the £3.71 saved by first wave fundholders compared with non-fundholders £3.57 was attributable to fundholding alone. Conclusion: In neither year did fundholding make a major contribution to the variation in prescribing behaviour among practices, which was better explained by deprivation, training status, and partnership status, but it did seem largely responsible for differences in the rise of total prescribing costs between fundholders and non-fundholders. Much of the variation in prescribing practice remains unexplained. Fundholding is the major contributor to the differences in the rise in prescribing costs between fundholders and non-fundholders.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Deprivation and cause specific morbidity: evidence from the Somerset and Avon survey of healthBMJ, 1996
- Poor correlation with Jarman index may be due to changes in deprivation since 1981BMJ, 1995
- Proposed new deprivation indexBMJ, 1995
- Management of the irritable bowel syndromeBMJ, 1995
- Low income scheme index: a new deprivation scale based on prescribing in general practiceBMJ, 1995
- Measuring prescribing: the shortcomings of the itemBMJ, 1994
- Variations in general practice prescribing costs and implications for budget settingHealth Economics, 1994
- Age, sex, and temporary resident originated prescribing units (ASTRO-PUs): new weightings for analysing prescribing of general practices in England.BMJ, 1993
- Explaining variations in prescribing costs across England.BMJ, 1993
- Predicting prescribing costs: A model of northern Ireland general practicesPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 1992