The use of causal indicators in covariance structure models: Some practical issues.
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Psychological Association (APA) in Psychological Bulletin
- Vol. 114 (3) , 533-541
- https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.533
Abstract
In conventional representations of covariance structure models, indicators are defined as linear functions of latent variables, plus error. In an alternative representation, constructs can be defined as linear functions of their indicators, called causal indicators, plus an error term. Such constructs are not latent variables but composite variables. and they have no indicators in the conventional sense. The presence of composite variables in a model can, in some situations, result in problems with identification of model parameters. Also, the use of causal indicators can produce models that imply zero correlation among many measured variables, a problem resolved only by the inclusion of a potentially large number of additional parameters. These phenomena are demonstrated with an example, and general principles underlying them are discussed. Remedies are described so as to allow for the evaluation of models that contain causal indicators.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 1991
- Relationships between linear systems theory and covarian ce structure modelingJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1986
- The Treatment of Unobservable Variables in Path AnalysisSociological Methodology, 1971
- Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive IllnessBritish Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1967