Hydatid liver disease: problems in diagnosis in the Middle East endemic area
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Pathogens and Global Health
- Vol. 82 (4) , 357-361
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00034983.1988.11812257
Abstract
Imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US), liver scan and computerized tomography (CT) localize mass lesions in the liver and abdomen, and are valuable tools in the differential diagnosis of hydatid disease. However, we present two cases from Kuwait in the Middle East which demonstrate that these techniques alone are not as accurate as claimed in this geographical area. A sensitive and specific serological test is essential for a pre-operative diagnosis of hydatid disease. Discrepancies between radiological imaging and serological diagnosis are best resolved by cytology of the drained fluid and/or histopathological examination of the excised cyst. Negative serology would indicate ultrasound-guided aspiration of cyst fluid for cytological verification or enzyme immunoassay.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Counterimmunoelectrophoresis Using an Arc 5 Antigen for the Rapid Diagnosis of Hydatidosis and Comparison with the Indirect Hemagglutination TestThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1987
- Hydatid liver disease, is it a diagnostic problem?Pathogens and Global Health, 1986
- A specific test for the identification of cyst fluid samples from suspected human hydatid infectionsTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1986
- II. The role of immunological techniques for the diagnosis of hydatid diseaseTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 1986