Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Transhepatic Cholangiography in Patients with Suspected Obstructive Jaundice
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 17 (6) , 731-735
- https://doi.org/10.3109/00365528209181086
Abstract
To establish principles for choosing between endoscopic retrograde and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography, we randomized 52 consecutive jaundiced patients with clinically suspected obstructive jaundice. The bile ducts were visualized in 85% by the endoscopic and in 84% by the transhepatic route. A conclusive diagnosis was reached in 89% and 68% of the patients, respectively, but the difference is not significant (0.10 < P < 0.2(1). If the planned type of cholangiography failed, the other method was tried. By comparing the total numbers of investigations, a conclusive diagnosis was achieved in 91% by endoscopic and 69% by transhepatic route, which is significantly different (P < 0.05). We therefore prefer to do endoscopic cholangiography initially with transhepatic cholangiography as the complementary method.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Transhepatic cholangiography: complicatons and use patterns of the fine-needle technique: a multi-institutional survey.Radiology, 1980
- ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY AND BILIARY OBSTRUCTIONThe Lancet, 1980
- The failed transhepatic cholangiogram.Radiology, 1980
- NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT OF BILIARY OBSTRUCTIONThe Lancet, 1979
- Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Obstructive JaundiceAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- Cholestasis in Ulcerative ColitisGastroenterology, 1977
- A Randomized Trial of Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiography with the Chiba Needle Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography for Bile Duct Visualization in JaundiceGastroenterology, 1976
- PTC Versus ERC—An Editor's DreamGastroenterology, 1976