Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study
Preprint
- 1 September 1998
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
This paper reports experiments designed to study strategic sophistication, the extent to which behavior in games reflects attempts to predict others' decisions, taking their incentives into account. Subjects played normal-form games with various patterns of iterated dominance and unique pure-strategy equilibria without dominance, using a computer interface that allowed them to look up hidden payoffs as often as desired, one at a time, while recording their look-up sequences. Monitoring subjects' information searches along with their decisions allows us more precisely to identify their decision rules, and subjects' deviations from the search patterns suggested by equilibrium analysis help to predict their deviations from equilibrium decisions.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experience-weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form GamesEconometrica, 1999
- Equilibrium in Evolutionary Games: Some Experimental ResultsThe Economic Journal, 1996
- Are People Bayesian? Uncovering Behavioral StrategiesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Epistemic Conditions for Nash EquilibriumEconometrica, 1995
- The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility TheoriesEconometrica, 1994
- Rational Learning Leads to Nash EquilibriumEconometrica, 1993
- An Experimental Study of the Centipede GameEconometrica, 1992
- Strategic Uncertainty, Equilibrium Selection, and Coordination Failure in Average Opinion GamesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991
- Bargaining phenomena and bargaining theoryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1987
- Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining.Psychological Review, 1979