Local anesthetic efficacy for oral surgery: Comparison of diphenhydramine and prilocaine
- 31 July 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology
- Vol. 86 (1) , 26-30
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90145-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adverse reactions to local anesthetics: Analysis of 197 casesJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Validation of Diphenhydramine as a Dermal Local AnestheticAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Local prophylactic benadryl injections in an attempt to reduce postinstrumental painJournal of Endodontics, 1994
- 1% Lidocaine Versus 0.5% Diphenhydramine for Local Anesthesia in Minor Laceration RepairAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1994
- Double-blinded comparison of diphenhydramine versus lidocaine as a local anestheticAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- An evaluation of 4% prilocaine and 3% mepivacaine compared with 2% lidocaine (1:100,000 epinephrine) for inferior alveolar nerve blockJournal of Endodontics, 1993
- LIDOCAINE VERSUS DIPHENHYDRAMINE FOR ANESTHESIA IN THE REPAIR OF MINOR LACERATIONSPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1993
- Use of diphenhydramine for local anesthesia in “caine”-sensitive patientsThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1989
- Efficacy of diphenhydramine hydrochloride for local anesthesia before oral surgeryThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 1987
- Antihistaminic properties of local anesthetics and anesthetic properties of antihistaminic compoundsJournal of Allergy, 1951