BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN VERSUS EPIRUBICIN FOR PRIMARY, SECONDARY OR CONCURRENT CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER: RESULTS OF A EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR THE RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF CANCER—GENITO-URINARY GROUP PHASE III TRIAL (30906)
- 1 February 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 173 (2) , 405-409
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000150425.09317.67
Abstract
We compared the efficacy and side effects of intravesical instillations of bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and epirubicin in patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder. Patients with primary, secondary or concurrent CIS of the bladder were randomized to 81 mg BCG-Connaught (6 weekly instillations) or 50 mg epirubicin (8 weekly instillations). When a complete response (CR), defined as no Ta/T1 or CIS on biopsy and negative cytology, was obtained, patients in the 2 groups received maintenance instillations at months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36. When no complete response was observed, the original treatment was repeated, followed again by cystoscopy and biopsies plus cytology. A total of 168 patients were randomized between March 1993 and April 1999 to receive BCG (84) or epirubicin (84), while 4 on epirubicin and 3 on BCG were ineligible. The majority (52%) had concurrent CIS. Primary and secondary CIS was found in 23% and 24% of cases, respectively. The overall CR rate was 56% for epirubicin and 65% for BCG (p = 0.21, 90% CI 21.5 to −2.9). When tumor was found following 2 instillation courses, further treatment was left to the investigator (BCG in 29 cases and epirubicin in 37). Time to bladder tumor recurrence after CR was longer in patients treated with BCG vs epirubicin (median 5.1 vs 1.4 years). CIS recurrences were more frequently observed in complete responders to epirubicin (45% vs 16%). No differences in time to progression or duration of survival were observed. Side effects were more frequently seen in patients on BCG with 26 on BCG and 8 on epirubicin stopping treatment due to side effects. No significant difference in CR rates could be demonstrated with intravesical instillations of epirubicin or BCG. Time to recurrence was significantly longer in patients treated with BCG after having achieved a CR. More CIS recurrences were found in patients treated with epirubicin. For time to progression and survival longer followup is warranted. Side effects were more frequent in patients on BCG.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intravesical BCG in Patients with Carcinoma in situ of the Urinary Bladder: Long–Term Results of EORTC GU Group Phase II Protocol 30861European Urology, 2001
- LOW DOSE BACILLUS CALMETTE-GUERIN FOR CARCINOMA IN SITU OF THE BLADDER: LONG-TERM RESULTSJournal of Urology, 2000
- Evolución y pronóstico del carcinoma in situ vesical tratado con bcgActas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition), 1999
- Primary bladder carcinoma in situ: assessment of early BCG response as a prognostic factor.European Urology, 1998
- Long-Term Efficacy of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Carcinoma in Situ: Relationship of Progression to Histological Response and p53 Nuclear AccumulationJournal of Urology, 1997
- Analysis of early failures after intravesical instillation therapy with bacille Calmette‐Guerin for carcinoma in situ of the bladderBritish Journal of Urology, 1995
- A Randomized Trial of Intravesical Doxorubicin and Immunotherapy with Bacille Calmette–Guérin for Transitional-Cell Carcinoma of the BladderNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Bacillus Calmette-Guérin therapy alters the progression of superficial bladder cancer.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- The Use of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin in the Therapy of Bladder Carcinoma in SituJournal of Urology, 1985
- Natural history and clinical behavior of in situ carcinoma of the human urinary bladderCancer, 1964