Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Analysis of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Combination with Efavirenz and Two Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Extensively Pretreated Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
- Vol. 47 (1) , 350-359
- https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.47.1.350-359.2003
Abstract
The steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two oral doses of lopinavir-ritonavir (lopinavir/r; 400/100 and 533/133 mg) twice daily (BID) when dosed in combination with efavirenz, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were assessed in a phase II, open-label, randomized, parallel arm study in 57 multiple protease inhibitor-experienced but non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects. All subjects began dosing of lopinavir/r at 400/100 mg BID; subjects in one arm increased the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg BID on day 14. When codosed with efavirenz, the lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID regimen resulted in lower lopinavir concentrations in plasma, particularly Cmin, than were observed in previous studies of lopinavir/r administered without efavirenz. Increasing the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg increased the lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval (AUC12), Cpredose, and Cmin by 46, 70, and 141%, respectively. The increase in lopinavir Cmax (33%,) did not reach statistical significance. Ritonavir AUC12, Cmax, Cpredose, and Cmin values were increased 46 to 63%. The lopinavir predose concentrations achieved with the 533/133-mg BID dose were similar to those observed with lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID in the absence of efavirenz. Results from univariate logistic regression analyses identified lopinavir and efavirenz inhibitory quotient (IQ) parameters, as well as the baseline lopinavir phenotypic susceptibility, as predictors of antiviral response (HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 24); however, no lopinavir or efavirenz concentration parameter was identified as a predictor. Multiple stepwise logistic regressions confirmed the significance of the IQ parameters, as well as other baseline characteristics, in predicting virologic response at 24 weeks in this patient population.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Virtual Inhibitory Quotient Predicts Response to Ritonavir Boosting of Indinavir-Based Therapy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients with Ongoing ViremiaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Safety and Antiviral Activity at 48 Weeks of Lopinavir/Ritonavir plus Nevirapine and 2 Nucleoside Reverse‐Transcriptase Inhibitors in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1–Infected Protease Inhibitor–Experienced PatientsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Pharmacological Basis for Concentration-Controlled Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and IndinavirAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- Comparative studies of two-times-daily versus three-times-daily indinavir in combination with zidovudine and lamivudineAIDS, 2000
- Baseline Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Phenotype, Genotype, and RNA Response after Switching from Long‐Term Hard‐Capsule Saquinavir to Indinavir or Soft‐Gel–Capsule Saquinavir in AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 333The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Novel Four‐Drug Salvage Treatment Regimens after Failure of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Inhibitor–Containing Regimen: Antiviral Activity and Correlation of Baseline Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility with Virologic OutcomeThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Ritonavir and saquinavir combination therapy for the treatment of HIV infectionAIDS, 1999
- HIV-1 and HIV-2 dual infectionAIDS, 1998
- Rapid turnover of plasma virions and CD4 lymphocytes in HIV-1 infectionNature, 1995
- The inhibitory quotient. A method for interpreting minimum inhibitory concentration dataJAMA, 1981