Doctors, Diagnosis, and Disability: A Disastrous Diversion
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- symposium
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 336 (336) , 61-66
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199703000-00009
Abstract
Patients and third party payers expect physicians to identify damage or disease as the cause of pain and disability, but often there is no damage or disease that can be identified. The process of disability determination requires physicians to make determinations that cannot be based on medical science and for which they have no specialized training. The combination of pseudodiagnosis and pseudodisability is likely to bankrupt countries that do not recognize this folly and design more productive health and disability systems. Physicians need much more education about human behavior and the highly variable relationships among disease, distress, and disability.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Outcomes and Costs of Care for Acute Low Back Pain among Patients Seen by Primary Care Practitioners, Chiropractors, and Orthopedic SurgeonsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Different concepts of chronic musculoskeletal pain.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1995
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Lumbar Spine in People without Back PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Arm Pain in the WorkplaceJournal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 1992
- Occupational Low-Back Pain, Illness Behavior, and DisabilitySpine, 1991
- Common symptoms in ambulatory care: Incidence, evaluation, therapy, and outcomePublished by Elsevier ,1989
- When back pain becomes disabling: a regional analysisPain, 1988
- Somatic presentations of psychiatric illness in primary care settingJournal of Psychosomatic Research, 1988
- How Many Days of Bed Rest for Acute Low Back Pain?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The Differential Utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality InventorySpine, 1986