Assessment of Optimal Selected Prognostic Factors
- 5 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Biometrical Journal
- Vol. 46 (3) , 364-374
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200310030
Abstract
The identification and assessment of prognostic factors is one of the major tasks in clinical research. The assessment of one single prognostic factor can be done by recently established methods for using optimal cutpoints. Here, we suggest a method to consider an optimal selected prognostic factor from a set of prognostic factors of interest. This can be viewed as a variable selection method and is the underlying decision problem at each node of various tree building algorithms.We propose to use maximally selected statistics where the selection is defined over the set of prognostic factors and over all cutpoints in each prognostic factor. We demonstrate that it is feasible to compute the approximate null distribution. We illustrate the new variable selection test with data of the German Breast Cancer Study Group and of a small study on patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma. Using the null distribution for a p‐value adjusted regression trees algorithm, we adjust for the number of variables analysed at each node as well.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Double-bagging: combining classifiers by bootstrap aggregationPattern Recognition, 2003
- Support Vector Machines for Protein Fold Class PredictionBiometrical Journal, 2003
- Comparison of Methods for the Computation of MultivariatetProbabilitiesJournal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 2002
- Classification Trees With Unbiased Multiway SplitsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2001
- Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profilingNature, 2000
- Dangers of Using "Optimal" Cutpoints in the Evaluation of Prognostic FactorsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1994
- An adaptive algorithm for the approximate calculation of multiple integralsACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 1991
- Testing for a Two-Phase Multiple RegressionTechnometrics, 1983
- An improved Bonferroni inequality and applicationsBiometrika, 1982
- An upper bound for the probability of a unionJournal of Applied Probability, 1976