Relation between Surgical Volume and Incidence of Postoperative Wound Infection
- 23 July 1981
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 305 (4) , 200-204
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198107233050405
Abstract
We used a statewide program for the surveillance and reporting of infections acquired in the hospital to examine the relation between volume of surgery and the incidence of postoperative wound infection. Over a 29-month period 25,941 surgical procedures performed at 22 hospitals were studied. For all procedures studied, the mean number of operations performed was directly related to hospital size (number of beds). A highly significant inverse relation was found between the logarithm of the frequency of operation and the infection rate for appendectomy, herniorrhaphy, cholecystectomy, colon resection, and abdominal hysterectomy. (The relation was borderline [P = 0.055] for laminectomy and not significant for cesarean section.) Although these data clearly demonstrate higher morbidity in hospitals performing relatively little surgery, there are several possible explanations, and no conclusions for health policy can yet be drawn. (N Engl J Med. 1981; 305:200–4.)This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Development of a Statewide Program for Surveillance and Reporting of Hospital-Acquired InfectionsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1979
- Effect of Infections on Hospital CareAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1978
- Postoperative Wound InfectionAnnals of Surgery, 1977
- HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED INFECTIONS I. SURVEILLANCE IN A UNIVERSITY HOSPITALAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1976
- A Five-Year Prospective Study of 23,649 Surgical WoundsArchives of Surgery, 1973
- Guidelines for Minimal Standards in Cardiovascular Surgery: Cardiovascular Committee of the American College of SurgeonsThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1973