Recommendations on Evidence Needed to Support Measurement Equivalence between Electronic and Paper-Based Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report
Top Cited Papers
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Value in Health
- Vol. 12 (4) , 419-429
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item BanksMedical Care, 2007
- Overview of Quantitative Measurement MethodsMedical Care, 2006
- Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural AdaptationValue in Health, 2005
- Practical Guidelines for Assessing the Clinical Significance of Health-Related Quality of Life Changes within Clinical TrialsDrug Information Journal, 2003
- Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status MeasuresMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2002
- THREE DIMENSIONS OF VOCABULARY DEVELOPMENTStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1999
- Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelinesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of ReliabilityEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1973
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960