Constraints on the Magnitude of α in Dynamo Theory
Open Access
- 10 May 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astrophysical Journal
- Vol. 534 (2) , 984-988
- https://doi.org/10.1086/308767
Abstract
We consider the back-reaction of the magnetic field on the magnetic dynamo coefficients and the role of boundary conditions in interpreting whether numerical evidence for suppression is dynamical. If a uniform field in a periodic box serves as the initial condition for modeling the back-reaction on the turbulent EMF, then the magnitude of the turbulent EMF, and thus the dynamo coefficient α, have a stringent upper limit that depends on the magnetic Reynolds number RM to a power of order -1. This is not a dynamic suppression but results just because of the imposed boundary conditions. In contrast, when mean field gradients are allowed within the simulation region, or nonperiodic boundary conditions are used, the upper limit is independent of RM and takes its kinematic value. Thus only for simulations of the latter types could a measured suppression be the result of a dynamic back-reaction. This is fundamental for understanding a long-standing controversy surrounding α suppression. Numerical simulations that do not allow any field gradients and invoke periodic boundary conditions appear to show a strong α suppression (e.g., Cattaneo & Hughes). Simulations of accretion disks that allow field gradients and allow free boundary conditions (Brandenburg & Donner) suggest a dynamo α that is not suppressed by a power of RM. Our results are consistent with both types of simulations.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resolution of an Ambiguity in Dynamo Theory and Its Consequences for Back‐Reaction StudiesThe Astrophysical Journal, 1999
- A Vorticity–Magnetic Field Dynamo InstabilityThe Astrophysical Journal, 1997
- The dependence of the dynamo alpha on vorticityMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1997
- GALACTIC MAGNETISM: Recent Developments and PerspectivesAnnual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1996
- Self-Consistency Constraints on the Dynamo MechanismThe Astrophysical Journal, 1995
- On the effects of a weak magnetic field on turbulent transportThe Astrophysical Journal, 1994
- Suppression of turbulent transport by a weak magnetic fieldThe Astrophysical Journal, 1991
- Magnetic helicity in astrophysicsAIP Conference Proceedings, 1986
- The topological properties of magnetic helicityJournal of Fluid Mechanics, 1984
- MagnetohydrodynamicsPhysics Today, 1957