Measuring Induced Abortion in Mexico
- 1 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 32 (4) , 529-558
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103262685
Abstract
The authors compare four methods of collecting information on abortion through survey research to measure the levels of induced abortion in Mexico: face-to-face interview (FTF), audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI), self-administered questionnaire (SAQ), and a random-response technique (RRT). They tested all methods in three samples: (1) hospital patients in Mexico City, (2) rural women in Chiapas, and (3) women randomly chosen as part of a house-to-house survey in Mexico City. In each sample, RRT found the highest rate of attempted induced abortion in the hospital, rural, and household samples (21.7, 36.1, and 17.9 percent, respectively), followed by the SAQ (19.3, 10.1, and 10.8 percent, respectively). The ACASI and FTF interviews yielded fewer reported abortion attempts. The RRT seems the most promising methodology to measure the levels of induced abortion. With SAQ, detailed information was obtained, and the reported frequency rates were slightly lower than the RRT rates in urban areas.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct QuestioningSociological Methods & Research, 2000
- Abortion and politics in Mexico: ‘context is all’Reproductive Health Matters, 2000
- The Relationship of Abortion to Trends in Contraception and Fertility in Brazil, Colombia and MexicoInternational Family Planning Perspectives, 1997
- Improving estimates of prevalence rates of sensitive behaviors: The randomized lists technique and consideration of self‐reported honestyThe Journal of Sex Research, 1995
- The Impact of the Proximate Determinants of Fertility: Evaluating Bongaarts's and Hobcraft and Little's Methods of EstimationPopulation Studies, 1992
- Substance use in a school-based clinic population: Use of the randomized response technique to estimate prevalenceJournal of Adolescent Health, 1992
- Covariate Randomized Response ModelsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1988
- Measuring associations with randomized responseSocial Science Research, 1984
- An Investigation of Interview Method, Threat and Response DistortionJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1976
- Randomized Response: A Survey Technique for Eliminating Evasive Answer BiasJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1965