Acupuncture for idiopathic headache
- 22 January 2001
- reference entry
- Published by Wiley
- No. 1,p. CD001218
- https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd001218
Abstract
Acupuncture is widely used for the treatment of headache, but its effectiveness is controversial. To determine whether acupuncture is: more effective than no treatment more effective than 'sham' (placebo) acupuncture as effective as other interventions used to treat idiopathic (primary) headaches. Electronic searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the database of the Cochrane Field for Complementary Medicine. We also contacted researchers in the field and checked the bibliographies of all articles obtained. Randomized or quasi‐randomized clinical trials comparing acupuncture with any type of control intervention for the treatment of idiopathic (primary) headaches were included. Information on patients, interventions, methods, and results was extracted by at least two independent reviewers using a pre‐tested standard form. Results on headache frequency and intensity were summarized descriptively. Responder rate ratios (responder rate in treatment group/responder rate in control group) were calculated as a crude indicator of results for sham‐acupuncture‐controlled trials. Quantitative meta‐analysis was not possible due to trial heterogeneity and insufficient reporting. Twenty‐six trials including a total of 1151 patients (median, 37; range, 10‐150) met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen trials were conducted among patients with migraine, six among patients with tension‐type headache, and four among patients with various types of headaches. The majority of trials had methodological and/or reporting shortcomings. In eight of the 16 trials comparing true and sham (placebo) acupuncture in migraine and tension‐type headache patients, true acupuncture was reported to be significantly superior; in four trials there was a trend in favor of true acupuncture; and in two trials there was no difference between the two interventions. (Two trials were uninterpretable.) The 10 trials comparing acupuncture with other forms of treatment yielded contradictory results. Overall, the existing evidence supports the value of acupuncture for the treatment of idiopathic headaches. However, the quality and amount of evidence are not fully convincing. There is an urgent need for well‐planned, large‐scale studies to assess the effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of acupuncture under real‐life conditions.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- St John's wort for depression--an overview and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trialsBMJ, 1996
- EFFECTS OF THE ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINTS WITH TENSION HEADACHEAcupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research, 1992
- Health Status in Patients with Tension Headache Treated with Acupuncture or PhysiotherapyHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 1990
- Muscle Tenderness in Tension Headache Treated with Acupuncture or PhysiotherapyCephalalgia, 1990
- Oculomotor Disturbances in Patients with Tension Headache Treated with Acupuncture or PhysiotherapyCephalalgia, 1990
- Acupuncture Vs Placebo In The Common Migraine: A Double Blind StudyCephalalgia, 1987
- Acupuncture Treatment of Chronic Tension Headache – A Controlled Cross-Over TrialCephalalgia, 1985
- The effects of acupuncture versus placebo in the treatment of headachePain, 1985
- EFFECTIVENESS OF ACUPUNCTURE AND PHYSIOTHERAPY ON MYOGENIC HEADACHE: A COMPARATIVE STUDYAcupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research, 1984
- Diagnosis and treatment of migraine in childrenNeurology, 1979