Faculty Opinions recommendation of The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate.
- 23 February 2002
- dataset
- Published by H1 Connect
- Vol. 159 (4) , 1789-804
- https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1004316.50056
Abstract
Newly emerging data from genome sequencing projects suggest that gene duplication, often accompanied by genetic map changes, is a common and ongoing feature of all genomes. This raises the possibility that differential expansion/contraction of various genomic sequences may be just as important a mechanism of phenotypic evolution as changes at the nucleotide level. However, the population-genetic mechanisms responsible for the success vs. failure of newly arisen gene duplicates are poorly understood. We examine the influence of various aspects of gene structure, mutation rates, degree of linkage, and population size (N) on the joint fate of a newly arisen duplicate gene and its ancestral locus. Unless there is active selection against duplicate genes, the probability of permanent establishment of such genes is usually no less than 1/(4N) (half of the neutral expectation), and it can be orders of magnitude greater if neofunctionalizing mutations are common. The probability of a map change (reassignment of a key function of an ancestral locus to a new chromosomal location) induced by a newly arisen duplicate is also generally >1/(4N) for unlinked duplicates, suggesting that recurrent gene duplication and alternative silencing may be a common mechanism for generating microchromosomal rearrangements responsible for postreproductive isolating barriers among species. Relative to subfunctionalization, neofunctionalization is expected to become a progressively more important mechanism of duplicate-gene preservation in populations with increasing size. However, even in large populations, the probability of neofunctionalization scales only with the square of the selective advantage. Tight linkage also influences the probability of duplicate-gene preservation, increasing the probability of subfunctionalization but decreasing the probability of neofunctionalization.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Evolution of an α-Esterase Pseudogene Inactivated in the Drosophila melanogaster LineageMolecular Biology and Evolution, 2000
- Nonfixed duplication containing the Adh gene and a truncated form of the Adhr gene in the Drosophila funebris species group: different modes of evolution of Adh relative to Adhr in DrosophilaMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1999
- Evolutionary preservation of redundant duplicated genesSeminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 1999
- On the Possibility of Constructive Neutral EvolutionJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1999
- Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative MutationsGenetics, 1999
- Mutation accumulation in transfer RNAs: molecular evidence for Muller's ratchet in mitochondrial genomesMolecular Biology and Evolution, 1996
- Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1994
- An intraspecific gene duplication polymorphism of the urate oxidase gene of Drosophila virilis: a genetic and molecular analysis.Molecular Biology and Evolution, 1993
- Polymorphism and loss of duplicate gene expression: a theoretical study with application of tetraploid fish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1979
- Gene duplication in tetraploid fish: model for gene silencing at unlinked duplicated loci.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1978