What is the true fetal loss rate in pregnancies affected by trisomy 21 and how does this influence whether first trimester detection rates are superior to those in the second trimester?
- 10 September 2001
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 21 (9) , 788-789
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.134
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- ReplyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2000
- Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage studyBMJ, 2000
- A screening program for trisomy 21 at 10–14 weeks using fetal nuchal translucency, maternal serum free β‐human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy‐associated plasma protein‐AUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- Maternal age‐ and gestation‐specific risk for trisomy 21Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
- The selective miscarriage of Down's syndrome from 10 weeks of pregnancyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1996
- Toward the optimal protocol for Down syndrome screeningAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1996
- Selective miscarriage of Down's syndrome fetuses in women aged 35 years and olderBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995
- New estimates of down syndrome risks at chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and livebirth in women of advanced maternal age from a uniquely defined populationPrenatal Diagnosis, 1995
- Analysis of national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales: trends in prenatal diagnosis, 1989-91.BMJ, 1993
- Results of first year (1989) of a national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales.BMJ, 1991