Comparison of the Efficacy of Local Therapies for Localized Prostate Cancer in the Prostate-Specific Antigen Era: A Large Single-Institution Experience With Radical Prostatectomy and External-Beam Radiotherapy
- 15 August 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 20 (16) , 3376-3385
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.01.150
Abstract
PURPOSE: To review biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates after either external-beam radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All 1,682 patients had pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and biopsy Gleason scores (bGS) assigned. No adjuvant therapy was administered after local treatment. RP was the treatment in 1,054 patients (63%) and RT in 628 patients (37%). Median follow-up was 51 months (range, 1 to 134). The median follow-up for RP versus RT patients was 50.5 v 51.0 months. Biochemical relapse was considered detectable PSA levels (> 0.2 ng/mL) in RP patients and three consecutive rising PSA levels in RT patients. The analysis was repeated with a more stringent definition of biochemical control after either RP or RT—namely, reaching and maintaining a PSA level ≤ 0.5 ng/mL—and excluding patients receiving any androgen deprivation (AD). RESULTS: Eight-year bRFS rates for RP versus RT were 72% and 70%, respectively (P = .010). Multivariate analysis indicated T stage (P < .001), pretreatment PSA (P < .001), bGS (P < .001), year of therapy (P < .001), and neoadjuvant AD (P = .019) to be the only independent predictors of relapse. Age (P = .78), race (P = .29), prior transurethral resection of prostate (P = .81), and treatment modality (P = .96) were not independent predictors of treatment failure. Fifty-one percent of RP patients had favorable tumors (T1 to T2A, pretreatment PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL, bGS ≤ 7), compared with only 34% of RT patients (P < .001). Repeat analysis with a stringent definition of biochemical failure and excluding patients receiving AD indicated no impact of treatment modality on outcome. CONCLUSION: Eight-year biochemical failure rates were identical between RT and RP in any subgroup. Outcome is determined mainly by pretreatment PSA levels, bGS, clinical T stage, and, for RT patients, radiation dose.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of biochemical failure on overall survival after radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer in the PSA eraInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2002
- Pretreatment Nomogram for Predicting the Outcome of Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy in Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2000
- Comparison of Recommendations by Urologists and Radiation Oncologists for Treatment of Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 2000
- Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studiesInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Higher than standard radiation doses (≥72 Gy) with or without androgen deprivation in the treatment of localized prostate cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2000
- Contemporary results of anatomic radical prostatectomy.CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1999
- Natural History of Progression After PSA Elevation Following Radical ProstatectomyJAMA, 1999
- Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMYUrologic Clinics of North America, 1997
- More on the uro-oncology research group report of radical surgery vs. radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the prostateInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1988