The Case for Anticoagulant Therapy
- 1 September 1964
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 30 (3) , 447-457
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.30.3.447
Abstract
In summary, the total world evidence suggests that in the absence of compelling contraindications and with the availability of satisfactory laboratory and clinical facilities, patients suffering with acute myocardial infarction should receive adequate anticoagulant therapy during the first month, and that the risk of reinfarction and death is reduced if this is continued for 1 to 2 years after the first month. More long-term studies should be conducted to evaluate this treatment for succeeding years. This form of therapy presents certain difficulties that must be weighed against the possible gains in deciding whether or not to continue it.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Anticoagulant TherapyPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1963
- Clinical and Necropsy Findings in Rupture of the MyocardiumScottish Medical Journal, 1963
- AN EVALUATION OF ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY FOR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1962
- Conservative Anticoagulant Therapy of Acute Myocardial InfarctionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1962
- The Anticoagulant DilemmaBMJ, 1962
- Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy After Acute Myocardial InfarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1961
- ANTICOAGULANTS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTIONThe Lancet, 1961
- An Assessment of Long-term Anticoagulant Administration after Cardiac InfarctionBMJ, 1959
- The Prevention of Myocardial InfarctionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1957